However, this great focus on the individual officers – who were merely reservists21 – forces this article to examine the responsibilities of individuals acting in what is described as ‘sadistic, blatant, and wanton’ ways.22 This article will discuss the general responsibilities of soldiers, as well as their responsibilities when superior orders require them to abuse. This article will argue that the soldiers perpetrating the abuse, their commanding officers and members of the George W. Bush Administration are all morally responsible for the abuse at Abu Ghraib. Available at, George W. Bush, Jr., cited inThe Economist, ‘Just a few bad apples?’. In this, all those who are taking part in formulating a common plan to commit war crimes, are responsible for all the acts perpetrated by any person in carrying that plan through. Available at And that's where the abuses happened. Risen, J. Moreover, the views expressed here do not necessarily represent the views of Inquiries Journal or Student Pulse, its owners, staff, contributors, or affiliates. 172-173, 183; Lawrence Wilkerson, cited in Dowd, M. ‘System on Trial’. In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1 (1946). For these reasons, arguing that the American people are responsible for the abuse at Abu Ghraib is unreasonable.Continued on Next Page ». People that were under tremendous pressure to get more actionable intelligence, then through the chain of command might give instructions to do whatever you need to do to get that information. 405-556. Everybody was covered, is covered by the Geneva Conventions, mainly because it's a sovereign state. You give Rumsfeld another four years as secretary of defense, the guy who did the Rumsfeld techniques of interrogation. The Conference of London of 1945, ‘Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis, and Charter of the International Military Tribunal. FRONTLINE home + WGBH + PBS, FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of wgbh educational foundation. According to the Abu Ghraib whistleblower, ‘nobody in command cared enough to find out’.46 Assuming that this is true, Karpinski failed in her responsibility, and her resulting inability to enforce the ban on torture means that she is responsible. Who ignored them? The New York Times (online), 29 April 2004. xxi-xxiii. It sounds very bizarre to say this, but Iraq is a conventional battlefield in the legal sense, even though it's an unconventional war right now. The Pentagon’s Doug Feith. House Democrats “asked the Pentagon last January about an internal Army report on dangerous conditions and poor management at the Abu Ghraib prison. Here it will argue that all moral agents are responsible for their own actions. OK, they were brought over there specifically to work with these, setting up these photographs and everything.

Baby Quokka, Adidas Matchcourt Slip-on, Hannibal 2001 Streaming, Doll Eyes Near Death, Best Blog Posts,