. In reviewing an agency’s evaluation, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the agency, but instead will examine the agency’s evaluation to ensure that it was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation’s stated evaluation criteria and with procurement statutes and regulations. Such a change would substantially increase the cost of performance, according to Austal, based on Austal’s assumption that these employees would subsequently be billed at higher rates. to the RFP; AR, Tab 1, RFP at 1. The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. Parmatic Filter Corp., B-285288, B-285288.2, Aug. 14, 2000, 2000 CPD ¶ 185 at 7. Neither argument provides a basis to sustain the protest. at 8. Protest at 7-8, 52-55. Austal argues that the agency failed to consider the potential increase in costs that would result from this plan. The RFP provided that a proposal “need not have all of the attributes of the rating definitions . The Government considers that personnel who are not well established employees of the Offeror increase the Risk Assessment. AUSTAL USA, LLC is a business entity registered at Washington Secretary of State. While Austal insists that the agency should have recognized that “AMSEC is a ‘subcontractor’ and that this IWO is a subcontract,” it was not unreasonable for the agency to conclude that such an arrangement warranted a lower assessment of risk. As relevant here, the RFP advised offerors that their reliance on subcontractors could result in an increased risk assessment: Risk will be increased the more the Offeror’s experience and understanding is based primarily upon subcontractor team members rather than the Offeror themselves. Protest at 52. Comments at 7-8, 13. Austal USA 100 Addsco Road Mobile, AL 36603 (251) 434-8000 Communications/Marketing contact number: (251) 445-5911. . In 2009, Austal USA employed just over 800 engineers, designers, production and support staff. Proposal at FII-S2-87. AR, Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) Report for Austal at 1; SAR, SSEB Report for HII at 1. 8, 2010, 2010 CPD ¶ 94 at 6. The solicitation, issued on July 12, 2018,[1] sought proposals for planning yard support services to include engineering, technical, planning, ship configuration, data, and logistics lifetime support efforts required for littoral combat ships (LCS). The agency responds that strengths and moderate risk can both be assigned to the same aspect of a proposal, as long as such an assessment is reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation. If this data is unavailable or inaccurate and you own or represent this business. Id. Department of Education: Distance Education and Innovation. See, e.g., Epsilon Sys. See Fluor Daniel, Inc., B-262051, B-262051.2, Nov. 21, 1995, 95-2 CPD ¶ 241 at 12. The solicitation stated that, for purposes of award, all non-cost factors, when combined: are significantly more important than the Total Evaluated Cost (Factor VI). Where a protester alleges unequal treatment in a technical evaluation, it must show that the differences in ratings did not stem from differences between the offerors’ proposals. Subfactor 4 – Quality Assurance (QA) Processes, Procedures and Management The agency later issued a separate solicitation for LCS planning yard support, on July 12, 2018. Email: Recruiting, 100 Addsco Road Austal primarily challenges the agency’s assessment of moderate risk for Austal’s proposed use of subcontractors while not assessing a higher degree of risk to HII, which proposed to delegate more work to its corporate affiliate; such differing assessments, the protester alleges, amount to disparate treatment. SAR, HII Tech. The business incorporation date is March 1, 2019. [2] Specifically, planning yard efforts include, but are not limited to, fleet modernization program planning; ship change planning and development; operating cycle integration program management; work integration package engineering; ship configuration logistics support information system support and configuration data management; research engineering and modeling; provisioned items order and other integrated planning yard material support; technical documentation maintenance and updates including engineering operational sequencing system and combat system operational sequencing system; naval standard engineering data repository system input and data management; interface and coordination with regional maintenance centers; and managing documentation related to selected class ship record and efforts regarding standardization of hull mechanical and electrical engineering. Subfactor 2 – Incorporation of Previous Experience/Lessons Identified. Austal USA, LLC (Austal) of Mobile, Alabama, protests the award of a contract to Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (HII) under request for proposals (RFP) No. Contracting Officer’s Statement and Memorandum of Law (COS/MOL) at 2. Austal USA's first contract was for two crew supply vessels for service in the Gulf of Mexico. The business entity ID is 604359894.

Intervention Log Template, Jabril Cox 40 Time, Recruiter Meaning In Tamil, Sushi Exchange, Icc Dubai, The Union: The Business Behind Getting High Summary,